actually i were not kidding - but also didn't notice that its not an option ...
sorry for confusion. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Clebert <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to be clear. Before things diverge again. No one is actually > considering hawt.io. I took that message as just kidding. > > Angular.js seems the best choice from what I have seen. > > > -- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone. > > > On Apr 16, 2015, at 08:41, Paul Gale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If Hawt.io has become/became a single page app (as opposed to the current > > forward-backward navigation) then > > it would be worth considering its inclusion; otherwise no. Might as well > > build some Angular based replacement > > console SPA from scratch in that case. > > > > Just my two cents. > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:59 AM, jgenender <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Yeah... I wouldn't open that can of worms... ;-) > >> > >> That said, perhaps at some point in the future hawt.io could be a > donation > >> to Apache that would likely garner A LOT of support and community > >> involvement. Imagine the possibilities if that happened! ;-) /me ducks > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-ActiveMQ-CodeName-Web-Console-tp4694984p4695055.html > >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> >
