Hi Tracy:
Official minutes will be out in a month or two, but in short the
report was accepted, and we approved the resolution changing the
chair.
The following comments were made (and what I emailed to the chair
(with private@ and board@ on cc) asking for on behalf of the board):
I wanted to bring back some comments from today's Board meeting,
specifically this comment:
"It is worth noting that while this report is very thorough,
there are still some community members that feel that it "papers
over important concerns", and there has been extremely
contentious discussion of it on the dev@ mailing list over the
last few days. There have also been two PMC resignations that
appear to be a direct result of these community tensions, which
are not noted in this report, presumably due to timing.
I had hoped that the face-to-face meetings in Austin would
alleviate some of these tensions, but there are mixed reports
about how that went, from "it was awesome" to "we avoided
talking about the actual issues." Disappointing, to say the
least.
I'm ok with accepting this report, but I'd recommend asking the
PMC to file followup reports while this tension continues, until
final decisions have been made, and ratified by the PMC, about
the direction that things are going to go."
Additionally, the Board is asking that you report monthly for the next
three months and that next months report addresses the issues raised
in the above comment.
--David
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Tracy Snell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why the silence? There was a raging debate here, then it went to a raging
> debate in private (just hearsay) and the board insisted on a report and
> surely there’s actions resulting from all this. The community is curious.
>
>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Tracy Snell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> So what happened? There are a lot of users with a lot of unanswered
>> questions. Silence for the community from the leaders seems to not only
>> include most of the debate but then even informing us on decisions made in
>> private that affect us.
>>
>> Love this “open” source community.
>
