The only thing I remember we had to add JDK 1.8 to the equation was
some option we needed for building javadocs. Perhaps there is a better
way to solve that.

Right now the codebase is not using anything specific to JDK 1.8.  (I
mean.. at least that's the idea. we could have slipped something.. but
I don't recall anything specific to java8 in the codebase)

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> I’ve updated a bunch of things so that Artemis now loads fairly easily into 
> Eclipse without any errors for all the non-example things.    I haven’t 
> attempted the examples yet.
>
> Just have a couple of questions:
>
> 1) In the poms, we specify that Java8 is required to build, but java7 is used 
> for the source/target.   Thus, Eclipse will pick up the Java7 runtime.  It 
> seems to work OK so I’m kind of wondering why we require Java8 to build.  
> Maybe in the examples someplace?
>
> 2) artemis-dto has a profile for jdk-1.5.   I assume that is not needed at 
> all as there is no way it would ever be triggered.   I think the ibmjdk 
> profile in there is irrelevant as well? (seems to reference things about 
> differences between 1.5 and 1.6)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>



-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected]
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com

Reply via email to