Ok, based on the feedback I think I will go ahead and add Camel to the shaded jar. I was leaning towards doing that but wanted to see if there were any objections. It seems like a reasonable thing to do and since it is supposed to be a way to get going without much effort I don't see a reason not to add it.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:57 PM, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, so it sounds like a nice-to-have, but not expected to be an essential > part of any production-grade solution. > > Makes sense. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Including-Camel-in-activemq-all-tp4700996p4701096.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
