ActiveMQ database persistence is not a way to achieve performance. High availability with high performance can be achieved using KahaDB in a shared filesystem location.
That aside, MSSQL is supported. I don’t think there is a complete regression testing done with each possible supported JDBC database for a specific release ActiveMQ. Take it for a test run if you decide to go the JDBC path, but I advise to go with KahaDB if you want speed. BR Petter Nordlander 16 sep 2015 kl. 16:17 skrev udurmus <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: Hello, Is ActiveMQ compatible with MS-SQL 2014? My project manager wants to use ActiveMQ in combination with Mulesoft, however I want to make sure guarantee high availability and performance, therefore want to connect to a database server, in this case MS-SQL. Do you support this, if yes how am I able to configure this? Kind regards, Umit Durmus -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-and-MS-SQL-2014-tp4702036.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com<http://Nabble.com>.
