I will investigate it on the afternoon.
Regarding the direct connection, that would be a question for wildfly guys. Can you ask there? (point the discussion here if you prefer with a link) On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:19 AM, jim_b_o <ja...@inaseq.com> wrote: > Yes, it will be the HTTP upgrade. The client is simply doing a JNDI lookup > for the connection factory via WildFly http-remoting. > > I'm not familiar with the 'direct connections' approach but am happy to read > on if you can point me at something. Although the high performance / low > latency I need is with the rest of my app, not the JMS in particular > (although I do appreciate it's good performance!). > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-use-of-PhantomReference-impacting-GC-performance-tp4706961p4707061.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Clebert Suconic
