Hello Matt, Thanks for your message. I will do these settings and see what happens. I have attached links to code and results.
My test show these two problems: - ActiveMQ Queue takes more time in Persistent Mode (Q28,Q31 rows in excel sheet) as compared to Sonic. - ActiveMQ Non Persistent Per Message Max time is very high. (Example: U59, U56). It looks consumer is not fast enough to process them. Overall, Maximum Time taken by any message in flight between producer and sender in ActiveMQ is quote high. I have copied the code to IDEONE editor (it's just a copy and IDEONE don't have necessary libs) to share if it helps: Producer: http://ideone.com/4nmARP Consumer: http://ideone.com/QnFHYk Results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hHt7EsgwGSxHR11edunWSuzzTbc88Wch8lFkBXmPxUI/edit?usp=sharing If you can't access code on IDEONE: Producer - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RbGUKYUbWUk8LcxqbCwf53_lNEfhnxfDz3TPqSNT2Dg/edit?usp=sharing Consumer - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jW5qPG40yUTBaHezEpjKrwBFZriL2bpxHZcM0U_2Gfk/edit?usp=sharing Sorry if above link passage is not as per forum protocol. I am new to the forum. Thanks AJ -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Performance-tp4712952p4713058.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.