On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi > > I already have an improved docker image with karaf and ActiveMQ. We have a > discussion at Apache about where to put this. > > Where is this conversation happening? > For now it's on my local server. I don't think it should go directly in > the project. > This would be inconsistent with most projects I've seen with docker deployment available. > > Regards > JB > > > > On Aug 16, 2016, 09:10, at 09:10, "Ismaël Mejía" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I have been improving the already excellent ActiveMQ docker image > >created > >by Roman Mohr, with the idea of contributing it upstream to be part of > >the > >official Apache repo. Currently there are many different ActiveMQ > >images > >for docker and I think Roman’s one is the one with the highest standard > >of > >quality, it is the cleanest one (no extra stuff) and the most popular > >with > >a compatible license (Apache). Additionally it already has a small > >community around it, that I think can be expanded if it is integrated > >into > >the official repo. > > > >So I wanted to ask here if there is interest in the community to accept > >this contribution, and if this is the case how can we proceed to do it. > > > >I link the current repo of the image as well as the current docker hub > >link > >for your consideration. > > > >https://github.com/rmohr/docker-activemq/ > >https://hub.docker.com/r/rmohr/activemq/ > > > >Ismaël >
