ah. Sorry.. What I wanted to say with this answer was: “yep, I know. I answered the mail“.
Voted 0 because I’m currently new to the project and not that "in it" as all of you. Need some time to get familiar with Artemis. > Am 07.09.2016 um 18:57 schrieb Justin Bertram <[email protected]>: > >> yep, I actually voted for it... > > You voted 0 which means you have no opinion. A vote of +1 would be a vote > "for it." > > > Justin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bennet Schulz" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 11:55:00 AM > Subject: Re: Documentation for Artemis 1.4.0 is missing > > yep, I actually voted for it, but misread the release version. Thought it > would be the vote for 1.5.0 :-D > >> Am 07.09.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>: >> >> 1.4.0 is up for voting. The website is staged here at my personal web >> page for now: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clebertsuconic/ >> >> >> As you probably saw at the VOTE thread for 1.4.0 >> >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Bennet Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> argh .. f*** sorry… you’re completely right. >>> >>>> Am 07.09.2016 um 18:29 schrieb Justin Bertram <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Artemis 1.4.0 hasn't been released so there's no reason why the >>>> documentation would be available at that URL. >>>> >>>> >>>> Justin >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Bennet Schulz" <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 11:24:03 AM >>>> Subject: Documentation for Artemis 1.4.0 is missing >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> just saw that the documentation for release 1.4.0 is currently missing: >>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs.html Are there reasons why it is >>>> missing or can I fix it somehow? >>>> >>>> >>>> best regards, >>>> Bennet >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic >
