We can make any required changes. I don't think it was really
intentional other than.. nobody extending it.. lets make it final ;)
Once you have a PR / diff whatever I will take a look.. I want to
make sure wildfly works.. I think Artemis should have as many Servers
as possible integrated.
If we can make it with a single RA... even better. (I hope this won't
endup with multiple ResourceAdapters imlementations.. one for each
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:33 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I believe we have a mostly working RA in TomEE now. The main change
> was something identified a while ago, the Resource Adapter class has to
> have an interface and be non-final. We were able to get that working for
> the most part in TomEE, where connection factories are injected from
> artemis. We ran into an issue with the MDB listening, but suspect its an
> issue on the TomEE side. Do you happen to know if the final declarations
> were intentional (and perhaps I'm forgetting something)?
> All in all, it worked pretty well. I have a JIRA to create and Jon F has
> the code changes to go in.
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:15 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
>> There's the artemis-ra where all the classes are.
>> That artemis-ra is just for the packaging for the ra.xml
>> Maybe we should move it somewhere else.
>> Did you guys get to any code changes required?
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 6:58 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>> > Hey,
>> > Just wrapped up the hacking. Its looking good so far. Just curious, one
>> > of the issues that was encountered is that there's no default rar
>> > for Artemis. Should there be? there's an example that ships, maybe it
>> > would make sense to include this in the main packages?
>> > I'm also wondering how other containers may package this up.
>> > John
>> Clebert Suconic