clebertsuconic wrote > I don't want to read that discussion again.. but from what I remember > of what I once read, and after I talked to some guys in person, the > issue was where the component would live.. like the plugin being > outside of AMQ5 code. > > I believe that if we consumed hawt-io as a component (just like we > consume Jetty), and have the plugins, checkstyles, apache branding, > activemq5 and Artemis brand on the main repo, it shouldn't be an > issue.
I wouldn't speculate. I wouldn't even attempt it unless you have examined the issues and do a 5 minute perusal on the thread. I won't argue what it was because I, and some other non-Red Hat folks were central to that discussion. My recommendation... don't rehash that. Look at the primary problems were (tl;dr; I mentioned them previously). Come up with a reasonable community based solution to the issues and present them. That said, I think branding would help significantly as long as any other concerns are resolved. I do know that templating it was certainly one of the offered solutions. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4717302.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
