I would suggest discussing the goals for such a console first. Is it
intended to monitory just one broker instance or a whole network of
brokers? Should it manage just the brokers or other services? Should it
rely on JMX or something else?
Then one can think about reusing and/or improving something that's
available or some other solution.
The way this discuss goes, sounds to me like trying to push again for
something that was rejected in the past and I suspect will not go anywhere.
My $0.02,
Hadrian
On 10/07/2016 06:41 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote:
+1 on improving/adding a console. Providing a console out of the box is a
massive win for user experience imo and something that I feel Artemis would
greatly benefit from. Whether it's HawtIO or something else we should make
every effort to standardise across both 5.x and Artemis.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]>
wrote:
@Hiram
The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the top right
corner).
That symbol on the top is just a link to the following:
"Like hawtio? It’s part of a community of Red Hat projects. Learn more
about Red Hat and our open source communities:"
No other implications from what I see.
