I think this is pretty straightforward: i - it should relay on JMX or jolokia.. A common thing between both Artemis and ActiveMQ
ii - it should manage at least a single broker.. with some metrics... iii - anything beyond that will just be a collaboration over the code. The best way to discuss this IMO would be through a Pull Request.. someone send an initial draft.. we can have some **technical** discussion over of PR, and commit it as version 1... then collaboratively this could be increased just as with anything else. I think we are clear from the previous discussions... and that's a request I am making here, probably the third time... lets CTRL-Alt-Del and start fresh... The issues we had are clear... and I see everybody with a single goal here.. to have an integrated console that looks like an Apache project, pretty and neat. Once someone put a first version, we can only improve it from there. On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote: > I would suggest discussing the goals for such a console first. Is it > intended to monitory just one broker instance or a whole network of brokers? > Should it manage just the brokers or other services? Should it rely on JMX > or something else? > > Then one can think about reusing and/or improving something that's available > or some other solution. > > The way this discuss goes, sounds to me like trying to push again for > something that was rejected in the past and I suspect will not go anywhere. > > My $0.02, > Hadrian > > > On 10/07/2016 06:41 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: >> >> +1 on improving/adding a console. Providing a console out of the box is a >> massive win for user experience imo and something that I feel Artemis >> would >> greatly benefit from. Whether it's HawtIO or something else we should >> make >> every effort to standardise across both 5.x and Artemis. >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Clebert Suconic >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> @Hiram >>>> >>>> The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the top right >>> >>> corner). >>> >>> >>> That symbol on the top is just a link to the following: >>> >>> "Like hawtio? It’s part of a community of Red Hat projects. Learn more >>> about Red Hat and our open source communities:" >>> >>> >>> >>> No other implications from what I see. >>> >> > -- Clebert Suconic
