On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: > I was under the impression that all Apache development discussions occur on > the email list.
As Justin Bertram Said, all PR comments are sent to the dev-list. What I'm really proposing, it's to be practical... to have something concrete to talk about on top of the code. Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I think this is pretty straightforward: >> >> i - it should relay on JMX or jolokia.. A common thing between both >> Artemis and ActiveMQ >> >> ii - it should manage at least a single broker.. with some metrics... >> >> >> iii - anything beyond that will just be a collaboration over the code. >> >> >> The best way to discuss this IMO would be through a Pull Request.. >> someone send an initial draft.. we can have some **technical** >> discussion over of PR, and commit it as version 1... then >> collaboratively this could be increased just as with anything else. >> >> >> >> I think we are clear from the previous discussions... and that's a >> request I am making here, probably the third time... lets CTRL-Alt-Del >> and start fresh... The issues we had are clear... and I see everybody >> with a single goal here.. to have an integrated console that looks >> like an Apache project, pretty and neat. >> >> >> Once someone put a first version, we can only improve it from there. >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I would suggest discussing the goals for such a console first. Is it >> > intended to monitory just one broker instance or a whole network of >> brokers? >> > Should it manage just the brokers or other services? Should it rely on >> JMX >> > or something else? >> > >> > Then one can think about reusing and/or improving something that's >> available >> > or some other solution. >> > >> > The way this discuss goes, sounds to me like trying to push again for >> > something that was rejected in the past and I suspect will not go >> anywhere. >> > >> > My $0.02, >> > Hadrian >> > >> > >> > On 10/07/2016 06:41 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 on improving/adding a console. Providing a console out of the box >> is a >> >> massive win for user experience imo and something that I feel Artemis >> >> would >> >> greatly benefit from. Whether it's HawtIO or something else we should >> >> make >> >> every effort to standardise across both 5.x and Artemis. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Clebert Suconic >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> @Hiram >> >>>> >> >>>> The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the top right >> >>> >> >>> corner). >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> That symbol on the top is just a link to the following: >> >>> >> >>> "Like hawtio? It’s part of a community of Red Hat projects. Learn more >> >>> about Red Hat and our open source communities:" >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> No other implications from what I see. >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic >> -- Clebert Suconic
