TL;DR but i believe you will appreciate this screenshots i have used zabbix to collect metrics and generate alerts, and used grafana like a passive artemis dashboard.
Basically grafana use zabbix like a data store via api. i have plan to write a article about how do that soon 2016-10-07 19:54 GMT-03:00 Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>: > a consolidated repo for AMQ and Artemis might be useful for other > stuff as well. not just the web console. > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:49 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think I just saw two great ideas: > > > > - A consolidated web console that is usable by both ActiveMQ and Artemis. > > - It should be an independent repository/utility. > > > > I think all of the discussions are happening on a ML, but realistically > if > > we're ready to start writing down some code, we need some of those > > utilities in place. Since PRs are mirrored to the MLs that would work, > but > > I would hate to see it baked into one of the existing repos to make that > > happen. > > > > John > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:41 PM Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I was under the impression that all Apache development discussions > occur on > >> the email list. This is for legal and policy reasons. Please correct me > if > >> I'm wrong. > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016, 9:43 AM Clebert Suconic <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I think this is pretty straightforward: > >> > > >> > i - it should relay on JMX or jolokia.. A common thing between both > >> > Artemis and ActiveMQ > >> > > >> > ii - it should manage at least a single broker.. with some metrics... > >> > > >> > > >> > iii - anything beyond that will just be a collaboration over the code. > >> > > >> > > >> > The best way to discuss this IMO would be through a Pull Request.. > >> > someone send an initial draft.. we can have some **technical** > >> > discussion over of PR, and commit it as version 1... then > >> > collaboratively this could be increased just as with anything else. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I think we are clear from the previous discussions... and that's a > >> > request I am making here, probably the third time... lets CTRL-Alt-Del > >> > and start fresh... The issues we had are clear... and I see everybody > >> > with a single goal here.. to have an integrated console that looks > >> > like an Apache project, pretty and neat. > >> > > >> > > >> > Once someone put a first version, we can only improve it from there. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > I would suggest discussing the goals for such a console first. Is it > >> > > intended to monitory just one broker instance or a whole network of > >> > brokers? > >> > > Should it manage just the brokers or other services? Should it rely > on > >> > JMX > >> > > or something else? > >> > > > >> > > Then one can think about reusing and/or improving something that's > >> > available > >> > > or some other solution. > >> > > > >> > > The way this discuss goes, sounds to me like trying to push again > for > >> > > something that was rejected in the past and I suspect will not go > >> > anywhere. > >> > > > >> > > My $0.02, > >> > > Hadrian > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On 10/07/2016 06:41 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> +1 on improving/adding a console. Providing a console out of the > box > >> > is a > >> > >> massive win for user experience imo and something that I feel > Artemis > >> > >> would > >> > >> greatly benefit from. Whether it's HawtIO or something else we > should > >> > >> make > >> > >> every effort to standardise across both 5.x and Artemis. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Clebert Suconic > >> > >> <[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John D. Ament < > >> [email protected]> > >> > >>> wrote: > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> @Hiram > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the top right > >> > >>> > >> > >>> corner). > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> That symbol on the top is just a link to the following: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> "Like hawtio? It’s part of a community of Red Hat projects. Learn > >> more > >> > >>> about Red Hat and our open source communities:" > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> No other implications from what I see. > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Clebert Suconic > >> > > >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > -- Fábio Santos [email protected] <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
