I don't think the attachments com through dev list. I don't see an attachment at least.
Probably better to provide a link somewhere ? On Friday, October 7, 2016, Fabio Gomes dos Santos <[email protected]> wrote: > TL;DR > > but i believe you will appreciate this screenshots > i have used zabbix to collect metrics and generate alerts, and used > grafana like a passive artemis dashboard. > > Basically grafana use zabbix like a data store via api. > > i have plan to write a article about how do that soon > > > > > > > > 2016-10-07 19:54 GMT-03:00 Clebert Suconic <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>: > >> a consolidated repo for AMQ and Artemis might be useful for other >> stuff as well. not just the web console. >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:49 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> > I think I just saw two great ideas: >> > >> > - A consolidated web console that is usable by both ActiveMQ and >> Artemis. >> > - It should be an independent repository/utility. >> > >> > I think all of the discussions are happening on a ML, but realistically >> if >> > we're ready to start writing down some code, we need some of those >> > utilities in place. Since PRs are mirrored to the MLs that would work, >> but >> > I would hate to see it baked into one of the existing repos to make that >> > happen. >> > >> > John >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:41 PM Jim Gomes <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> > >> >> I was under the impression that all Apache development discussions >> occur on >> >> the email list. This is for legal and policy reasons. Please correct >> me if >> >> I'm wrong. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016, 9:43 AM Clebert Suconic < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I think this is pretty straightforward: >> >> > >> >> > i - it should relay on JMX or jolokia.. A common thing between both >> >> > Artemis and ActiveMQ >> >> > >> >> > ii - it should manage at least a single broker.. with some metrics... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > iii - anything beyond that will just be a collaboration over the >> code. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > The best way to discuss this IMO would be through a Pull Request.. >> >> > someone send an initial draft.. we can have some **technical** >> >> > discussion over of PR, and commit it as version 1... then >> >> > collaboratively this could be increased just as with anything else. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I think we are clear from the previous discussions... and that's a >> >> > request I am making here, probably the third time... lets >> CTRL-Alt-Del >> >> > and start fresh... The issues we had are clear... and I see everybody >> >> > with a single goal here.. to have an integrated console that looks >> >> > like an Apache project, pretty and neat. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Once someone put a first version, we can only improve it from there. >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > I would suggest discussing the goals for such a console first. Is >> it >> >> > > intended to monitory just one broker instance or a whole network of >> >> > brokers? >> >> > > Should it manage just the brokers or other services? Should it >> rely on >> >> > JMX >> >> > > or something else? >> >> > > >> >> > > Then one can think about reusing and/or improving something that's >> >> > available >> >> > > or some other solution. >> >> > > >> >> > > The way this discuss goes, sounds to me like trying to push again >> for >> >> > > something that was rejected in the past and I suspect will not go >> >> > anywhere. >> >> > > >> >> > > My $0.02, >> >> > > Hadrian >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On 10/07/2016 06:41 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> +1 on improving/adding a console. Providing a console out of the >> box >> >> > is a >> >> > >> massive win for user experience imo and something that I feel >> Artemis >> >> > >> would >> >> > >> greatly benefit from. Whether it's HawtIO or something else we >> should >> >> > >> make >> >> > >> every effort to standardise across both 5.x and Artemis. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Clebert Suconic >> >> > >> <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John D. Ament < >> >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> >> > >>> wrote: >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> @Hiram >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the top >> right >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> corner). >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> That symbol on the top is just a link to the following: >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> "Like hawtio? It’s part of a community of Red Hat projects. Learn >> >> more >> >> > >>> about Red Hat and our open source communities:" >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> No other implications from what I see. >> >> > >>> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Clebert Suconic >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic >> > > > > -- > Fábio Santos > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422> > -- Clebert Suconic
