https://postimg.org/image/rd4wygyt7/ https://postimg.org/image/tt6qcbgvv/
2016-10-07 20:36 GMT-03:00 Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>: > I don't think the attachments com through dev list. > I don't see an attachment at least. > > Probably better to provide a link somewhere ? > > > > On Friday, October 7, 2016, Fabio Gomes dos Santos <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > TL;DR > > > > but i believe you will appreciate this screenshots > > i have used zabbix to collect metrics and generate alerts, and used > > grafana like a passive artemis dashboard. > > > > Basically grafana use zabbix like a data store via api. > > > > i have plan to write a article about how do that soon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-10-07 19:54 GMT-03:00 Clebert Suconic <[email protected] > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>: > > > >> a consolidated repo for AMQ and Artemis might be useful for other > >> stuff as well. not just the web console. > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:49 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected] > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> > I think I just saw two great ideas: > >> > > >> > - A consolidated web console that is usable by both ActiveMQ and > >> Artemis. > >> > - It should be an independent repository/utility. > >> > > >> > I think all of the discussions are happening on a ML, but > realistically > >> if > >> > we're ready to start writing down some code, we need some of those > >> > utilities in place. Since PRs are mirrored to the MLs that would > work, > >> but > >> > I would hate to see it baked into one of the existing repos to make > that > >> > happen. > >> > > >> > John > >> > > >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:41 PM Jim Gomes <[email protected] > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> I was under the impression that all Apache development discussions > >> occur on > >> >> the email list. This is for legal and policy reasons. Please correct > >> me if > >> >> I'm wrong. > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016, 9:43 AM Clebert Suconic < > >> [email protected] > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > I think this is pretty straightforward: > >> >> > > >> >> > i - it should relay on JMX or jolokia.. A common thing between both > >> >> > Artemis and ActiveMQ > >> >> > > >> >> > ii - it should manage at least a single broker.. with some > metrics... > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > iii - anything beyond that will just be a collaboration over the > >> code. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > The best way to discuss this IMO would be through a Pull Request.. > >> >> > someone send an initial draft.. we can have some **technical** > >> >> > discussion over of PR, and commit it as version 1... then > >> >> > collaboratively this could be increased just as with anything else. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > I think we are clear from the previous discussions... and that's a > >> >> > request I am making here, probably the third time... lets > >> CTRL-Alt-Del > >> >> > and start fresh... The issues we had are clear... and I see > everybody > >> >> > with a single goal here.. to have an integrated console that looks > >> >> > like an Apache project, pretty and neat. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Once someone put a first version, we can only improve it from > there. > >> >> > > >> >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea < > [email protected] > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > I would suggest discussing the goals for such a console first. Is > >> it > >> >> > > intended to monitory just one broker instance or a whole network > of > >> >> > brokers? > >> >> > > Should it manage just the brokers or other services? Should it > >> rely on > >> >> > JMX > >> >> > > or something else? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Then one can think about reusing and/or improving something > that's > >> >> > available > >> >> > > or some other solution. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > The way this discuss goes, sounds to me like trying to push again > >> for > >> >> > > something that was rejected in the past and I suspect will not go > >> >> > anywhere. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > My $0.02, > >> >> > > Hadrian > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On 10/07/2016 06:41 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> +1 on improving/adding a console. Providing a console out of > the > >> box > >> >> > is a > >> >> > >> massive win for user experience imo and something that I feel > >> Artemis > >> >> > >> would > >> >> > >> greatly benefit from. Whether it's HawtIO or something else we > >> should > >> >> > >> make > >> >> > >> every effort to standardise across both 5.x and Artemis. > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Clebert Suconic > >> >> > >> <[email protected] > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > >> >> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John D. Ament < > >> >> [email protected] > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > >> >> > >>> wrote: > >> >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> @Hiram > >> >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the top > >> right > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> corner). > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> That symbol on the top is just a link to the following: > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> "Like hawtio? It’s part of a community of Red Hat projects. > Learn > >> >> more > >> >> > >>> about Red Hat and our open source communities:" > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> No other implications from what I see. > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Clebert Suconic > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Clebert Suconic > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Fábio Santos > > [email protected] > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422> > > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > -- Fábio Santos [email protected] <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
