+1, no reason to keep broken stuff around.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> ⁣​
>
> On Oct 28, 2016, 09:19, at 09:19, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >+1
> >
> >On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert Suconic
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >> There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I
> >> don't really think anyone will be using it:
> >>
> >> - aerogear:
> >>     * It's not working
> >>     * I am not sure about the status of Aerogear
> >>     * It's probably better to be integrated the other way around.
> >i.e.
> >> Aerogear consuming artemis
> >> - vertx
> >>    * There are other ways to integrate with vertx. the most obvious
> >is
> >> through the AMQP bridge. also you could create VertX components in
> >> Vertx which is more component oriented than a message broker.
> >>    * It's broken as well, even using a very old version.
> >>
> >>
> >> I will remove these two modules and its tests before the release
> >> (which I'm still trying to get it out asap.. I just keep looking for
> >> issues, given my OCD level :) ).. we can always revert from git later
> >> if we get any real users (I really doubt that).. and then it should
> >be
> >> proper fixed if anyone is using it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Any objections?
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Claus Ibsen
> >-----------------
> >http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> >Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>

Reply via email to