+1, no reason to keep broken stuff around. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Regards > JB > > > > On Oct 28, 2016, 09:19, at 09:19, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >+1 > > > >On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert Suconic > ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I > >> don't really think anyone will be using it: > >> > >> - aerogear: > >> * It's not working > >> * I am not sure about the status of Aerogear > >> * It's probably better to be integrated the other way around. > >i.e. > >> Aerogear consuming artemis > >> - vertx > >> * There are other ways to integrate with vertx. the most obvious > >is > >> through the AMQP bridge. also you could create VertX components in > >> Vertx which is more component oriented than a message broker. > >> * It's broken as well, even using a very old version. > >> > >> > >> I will remove these two modules and its tests before the release > >> (which I'm still trying to get it out asap.. I just keep looking for > >> issues, given my OCD level :) ).. we can always revert from git later > >> if we get any real users (I really doubt that).. and then it should > >be > >> proper fixed if anyone is using it. > >> > >> > >> Any objections? > > > > > > > >-- > >Claus Ibsen > >----------------- > >http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > >Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >
