On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:51 AM Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think the JIRA itself pretty well sums it up -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-780.
>
>
I suspect you have a lot more context to this than is really stated in the
ticket.  Its not a bad thing, but imagine those who are outside trying to
make sense of this.

The ticket describes a potential problem - how topics are implemented in
Artemis as basically special queues based on the subscribers (queue per
subscriber).

It'd be good to get an understanding about how this affects the overall
roadmap of Artemis.  If I read the code changes correctly, you're
essentially adding config options that indicate a destination has multiple
subscribers.  I'm mostly curious after looking at it around how pubsub
messaging operates.  I have cases where I may have a single client
representing multiple physical servers.  Is that going to be possible still
if I have infrequently accesses clients?

More than anything its pure curiosity about how something might be working
that is on going, especially when the ticket's state doesn't seem to match
the current wip.

John


>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John D. Ament" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 7:21:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Temporary Branch for ARTEMIS-780
>
> Hmm so I missed this the first go around.  The note from Justin made me
> take a look.
>
> What exactly is ARTEMIS-780?  Whats the idea behind it?
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:56 PM Martyn Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I'm starting to look at the improvements around the addressing model
> > (ARTEMIS-780) there's going to be a fair amount of change involved that
> may
> > break certain parts of the broker (at least until it's fully completed).
> >
> > For this reason, I've created a separate branch "ARTEMIS-780" to house
> > changes until it's ready to merge on master.  It also means that others
> can
> > work on sub tasks in parallel.  I'll ensure the branch is deleted once
> the
> > work is merged onto master.
> >
> > Thanks all
> > Martyn
> >
>

Reply via email to