+1, it makes sense to me. I suppose it would be good to hear what Claus thinks about moving it to see if there would be any potential issues or reasons not to move it.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > That actually makes things a lot clearer to me. > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Christian > > > > It sounds good to me. > > > > Thanks. > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Feb 7, 2017, 06:38, at 06:38, Christian Schneider < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>There are some issues supporting the new camel version 2.18.x in > >>activemq. See > >> > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6585 > >> > >>In the issue we discussed that it would be better to have the activemq > >>camel component in the camel project. There is also the question about > >>the camel plugin for the broker. I do not know any users who use camel > >>inside the activemq broker. So the proposal here is to deprecate and > >>remove the plugin at some point. > >> > >>If both are removed from activemq source then managing the dependencies > >> > >>is a lot easier. > >> > >>What do you think? > >> > >>Christian > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Christian Schneider > >>http://www.liquid-reality.de > >> > >>Open Source Architect > >>http://www.talend.com > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
