would anyone object if I open a request on Infra to convert it to git?
Also: since Duane will start as a contributor, and it is expected to send a considerable amount of contributions, should him sign up the contributors agreement? On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is actually the list you should follow up with the question: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-legal > > > but I think just the JIRA should be enough. > > > Other guys here will have more experience on that.. they may provide > more information, but that's what I would do.. open the LEGAL JIRA. > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Clebert Suconic > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> how I would do regarding legal: >> >> >> i would create a JIRA on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL >> >> >> And I would follow up with a [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list, >> referencing the JIRA. >> >> >> Pointing out the dependency you will include, the license and the >> source of the project. >> >> >> I don't foresee any issues.. but it would be nice to have you on board >> with that discussion. >> >> >> >> >> >> I really think we should convert the NMS as a github project. I have >> seen more interest on projects around github these days. (TBH I don't >> even remember how to use SVN, git by itself is another + on building >> community). >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Duane Pauls <duane.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks for the feedback. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:03 PM Jim Gomes <jgo...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > As you point out, the licensing seems to be compatible, but maybe a quick >>>> > review from Apache legal might be a good idea since the intent is to >>>> > re-integrate it into the NMS codebase as an official project. >>>> >>> >>> Would you be able to explain how I'd do this (or refer me to some >>> instructions)? >>> >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> > The NMS code is in Subversion, and not in Git. Here is the repository >>>> URL: >>>> > >>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/activemq-dotnet/ >>>> Apache.NMS.AMQP/trunk >>>> > . >>>> > It does not need to be ported to Git in order to create a new AMQP >>>> provider >>>> > implementation. >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> It would make it easier to contribute thought. PRs is a perfect way to >>>> start with contributions. >>> >>> >>> From my point of view we wouldn't strictly require a conversion to git. >>> But I agree PR's would simplify reviews and contributions. >>> >>> >>> >>>> > > you could also include ActiveMQ Artemis to the list of brokers. >>>> >>> >>> I agree it makes sense to add Artemis to the list of brokers. >>> >>> >>> >>>> > > Do you have an idea on how much effort it would take... do you have >>>> > > any ideas for the initial implementation already? >>>> >>> >>> One of my colleagues, Chris Morgan has spent more time than I have at this >>> stage scoping the effort. We think this will likely take a few months. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Duane >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
