I think u still need to fill a contributors agreement PR is a good way to start. But since your PRs will be likely substantial I would recommend the agreement filled from the guys involved.
Someone with more legal background can probably help with additional information. On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:25 PM Duane Pauls <duane.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > In parallel with getting this proposal ready, we went ahead and created a > github repo to get started: > https://github.com/SolaceLabs/nms-amqp > > It's basically empty, but work has just kicked off in a fork: > https://github.com/cjwmorgan-sol-sys/nms-amqp/ > > As this proposal would indicate, our intent is to migrate this to Apache. > Would the community prefer we continue to work outside of the main Apache > codebase until it is at least equal in functionality to the existing > NMS.AMQP codebase? Or would it be preferred that we submit PR's or patches > as we go? If we patch/PR as we go, I'd expect we keep it off on a branch > until it is close to being ready for public consumption. I don't think we > need to be in a hurry to clobber what's there until we have something > useful. > > Note if the NMS migration to git moves forward, I'd plan to at the very > least migrate work to a fork of the Apache repo sooner rather than later. > I'm mainly curious if the preference is to see many piecemeal PR's of the > initial implementation, or a large PR when most development is complete, > followed by smaller PR's as the project is hardened. > > Cheers, > Duane > -- Clebert Suconic
