Sounds good we can talk monday (i guess today).   I think the current
strategy of converting to core and using the existing importer is fine for
now as i don't want to hold up a 2.0.0 release.  But we can target
enhancements for future versions.

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
wrote:

> PR just arrived :)
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1064
>
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Clebert Suconic
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @CShanon: I was actually dealing with the exporter/importer today.
> >
> > You're right.. the body of the message is for core-only.
> >
> >
> > We could do the following:
> >
> >
> > I - expand the format to be agnostic:
> >
> >
> > <Text></text>
> > </bytes></bytes>
> > <map></map>
> >
> >
> >
> > or we could encode at the protocols....
> >
> >
> > it seems easier to just use the protocol now. we could talk mon monday
> on IRC?
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Clebert Suconic
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> ... almost there... my testsuite is almost cleaned up.. there will be
> >> a few tests failing that will fix after bringing into master.
> >>
> >> I am planning to bring this into master between now and monday.
> >>
> >> this is just a heads up.
> >>
> >> Meanwhile (weekend anyways)... please don't make any too heavy changes
> >> :) especially under ./artemis-protocols... or anything that will touch
> >> Message... (that's a reason I actually want to merge soon, there's a
> >> PR Martyn sent for instance that would clash conceptually (not just
> >> lines of code)).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Clebert Suconic
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> :O. Wow!!!!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> All this perspiration is paying of at least.  1% inspiration (the idea
> to
> >>> use messages directly is quite simple). But changing the amount of
> >>> dependencies to it. Required some work.
> >>>
> >>> I ran the test suite yesterday.  Some failures but I know what are
> they.
> >>> That means I am almost there to send a PR.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:34 AM nigro_franz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> the hw/os configuration is:
> >>>> - Intel® Xeon® Processor E3-1505M v5
> >>>> - Linux 4.9.6 x86_64
> >>>> - 32 GB RAM
> >>>> - openjdk version "1.8.0_121"
> >>>>
> >>>> test configuration (1 producer vs 1 consumer):
> >>>> -  protocol = amqp
> >>>>  - delivery = NonPersistent
> >>>>  - destination type = Queue
> >>>>  - message bytes = 100
> >>>>  - runs = 5
> >>>>  - warmup iterations = 100000
> >>>>  - iterations = 100000
> >>>>
> >>>> Clebert encoding patch
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Producer Throughput: 42713 ops/sec
> >>>> Consumer Throughput: 65444 ops/sec
> >>>> EndToEnd Throughput: *39095 ops/sec*
> >>>>
> >>>> Old encoding
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Producer Throughput: 36617 ops/sec
> >>>> Consumer Throughput: 8203 ops/sec
> >>>> EndToEnd Throughput: *6451 ops/sec*
> >>>>
> >>>> The throughput is improved of about 1 order of magnitude, really an
> >>>> awesome
> >>>> job Clebert!!!!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> View this message in context:
> >>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-ARTEMIS-
> 1009-Pure-Messaging-Encoding-Refactoring-Artemis-2-0-
> tp4722638p4722689.html
> >>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Clebert Suconic
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Reply via email to