Let's make the links 2.x and 1.x. Immutable links makes it easier on google? On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:47 PM Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/13/2017 04:44 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > Right now we have 10. And going up. > > > > 1.0, 1.1, .... 1.5.0 1.5.1....1.5.4. 2.0 > > I think John is saying the same thing I said earlier, only keep 1.5.4 > and 2.0.0 as those are the latest supported releases, when 1.5.5 ships > then drop 1.5.4 ... > > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:37 PM Timothy Bish <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On 03/13/2017 04:07 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > >>> Sure. Latest 1.x and latest 2.x. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Just that it seems too much now. > >> Isn't that just two instances? That doesn't seem like to much. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM Jiri Danek <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Clebert Suconic < > >>>> [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I was wondering if we could / should update the docs page to only > >>>>> include the latest version (that is 2.0.0)... The docs are still > >>>>> maintained at the git, so you can always refer to the doc of the > >>>>> version you're using when you download.. or you can use links from > >>>>> github. > >>>>> > >>>> It seems strange to maintain the 1.x release stream and not have > >>>> documentation for it on the site. There should be at least the latest > >> 1,x > >>>> and the latest 2.0 version. > >>>> > >>>> The projects whose documentation I often browse online all have > previous > >>>> doc versions on the site, be it https://www.postgresql.org/docs/, > >> Python > >>>> or > >>>> readthedocs.io hosted sites like http://docs.pachyderm.io/en/stable/ > >> (see > >>>> the version picker at the bottom left). > >>>> > >>>> readthedocs.io sites also have a noticebar that alerts users that > they > >> are > >>>> browsing documentation for older release; I once raised this as > feature > >>>> request https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-615 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> That would also make it easier for web robots (google, etc) to index > >> it. > >>>> <link href="http://www.example.com/canonical-version-of-page/"; > >>>> rel="canonical" /> > >>>> > >>>> in the HTML head section should take care of that. This is what > >>>> readthedocs.io does. > >>>> -- > >>>> Jiří Daněk > >>>> Messaging QA > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Tim Bish > >> twitter: @tabish121 > >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >> > >> -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > -- > Tim Bish > twitter: @tabish121 > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > -- Clebert Suconic
