Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1093
@clebertsuconic I though about this but annoyingly theyre named nioBlah as
such just using that would be not directly indicate you're affecting epoll.
Like wise if we were to strip the nio part then they would be generic but would
break any compatibility with existing clients as they'd have to change their
properties if used.
This is why I introduce the extra duplicate props. If you think renaming
the existing properties to generic in nature I can do this but as noted
wouldn't be back compatible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
