It should still be part of the release. It's a valid test anyoene can run.
We just make it clear. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:32 AM Martyn Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > Good idea Clebert. We probably don't want to include these smoke tests as > part of the release, so can you ensure you don't include it in the examples > pom :) > > Cheers > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > We always had the examples on Artemis playing a double thingy... being > > both an educational and documentational resource, and that has also > > saved us a few times from making changes that would invalidate > > configurations and the manual. > > > > > > However, to replicate ARTEMIS-1089 now, I couldn't easily produce a > > testcase for it.. Instead I wrote an example like code (using the same > > maven framework, and everything else).. but this time it doesn't have > > the purpose of documentation. > > > > > > for that reason I am creating a new folder ./smoke under examples, and > > I'm adding a readme.md as part of it. > > > > > > > > I'm mainly adding this discuss thread to suggest other people to do > > the same in certain cases where a testcase is hard to reproduce a > > production life scenario. Testcases are still the preferable way to > > replicate bugs.. but in certain cases this will help us eat our own > > dog food. (it certainly helped me). > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > -- Clebert Suconic
