The GC free paging (on the write path at least) seems to perform pretty good:
This is without using it: Producer Throughput: 42153 ops/sec Consumer Throughput: 42453 ops/sec EndToEnd Throughput: 40818 ops/sec EndToEnd SERVICE-TIME Latencies distribution in MICROSECONDS mean 852567.48 min 517996.54 50.00% 843055.10 90.00% 1098907.65 99.00% 1384120.32 99.90% 1451229.18 99.99% 1493172.22 max 1493172.22 count 1000000 This is using it: Producer Throughput: 49744 ops/sec Consumer Throughput: 49739 ops/sec EndToEnd Throughput: 49738 ops/sec EndToEnd SERVICE-TIME Latencies distribution in MICROSECONDS mean 4948.23 min 92.16 50.00% 2162.69 90.00% 11337.73 99.00% 42991.62 99.90% 115867.65 99.99% 121110.53 max 122159.10 count 1000000 The throughput is increased by 25% and the latencies are far better (less GC and shorter ones). -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Paging-tp4724085p4724761.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
