I'm not sure what foot traffic means. If u look at github you will see how much work it's being done on both Artemis and activemq. I don't think anyone is opposing work on the website.
I'm sure people will be able to do it after 2.1 is out. I'm looking to work on that myself if no one else is doing it. On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:19 PM Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote: > It also didn't get as much foot traffic :) > > On 04/24/2017 10:33 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > That also reminds us how much refacing the website needs. > > > > > > I just refaced my kitchen. And look. It wasn't as old as this website. ;) > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:04 AM Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> FYI > >> > >> > >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- > >> Subject: Websites still using old ASF logos - update logo instead of > site? > >> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:38:36 +0100 > >> From: sebb <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> > >> Quite a few websites are still using the old ASF logos. > >> > >> For example: > >> http://bigtop.apache.org/ > >> http://activemq.apache.org/ > >> http://uima.apache.org/ > >> > >> Ideally the sites should be updated to use the new logos, but it > >> occurs to me that a quick solution would be to replace the old logo > >> file with the new version scaled to the same size. > >> > >> > >> Would that be an OK approach, assuming that its possible to replicate > >> the sizes? > >> > >> Or is it better to leave the sites displaying the old logos? > >> > -- Clebert Suconic
