I mean the opposite. We test it.
If broken either revert or fix it. On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 9:28 AM nigro_franz <[email protected]> wrote: > ok! > Just to see If I've understood it: you're proposing to let the TimedBuffer > be as it is now until we (the users I mean) have a real proof that is not > safe. In that case, revert it or just apply the minimum change to make it > work as before, until a new one will be tested & released. That's because > the change (in code) is so minimal between the twos and is not enough to > justify an increased complexity in the configuration..Right? Or have I > missed something? > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Artemis-IOPS-Limiter-strategy-tp4725875p4726125.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Clebert Suconic
