The JMS connection Pool currently in ActiveMQ could live there On 9 June 2017 at 04:52, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote:
> As long as we can define a bigger scope.. otherwise wouldn't be an > overkill to start a project for this? > > What's the name? commons-messaging? > > > but there's already a commons project within apache... > > > I will be away for 2 weeks... Hope this to be sorted while I'm away .. > .please??? > > > Just kidding though.. if it's not sorted.. I may revisit this route as > well. for now @michael use your or a new github account until we > figure out where. > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 06/08/2017 11:21 AM, Michael André Pearce wrote: > >> > >> Hi All > >> > >> I would like to discuss proposing a new sub project , named > >> "activemq-extras" > >> > >> There is some common / generic components not specific to activemq5 , > >> artemis, qpid jms that currently live within or without some extras > project > >> would end up living in one. > >> > >> Some of these could be: > >> PooledConnectionFactory > >> Proposed custom serdes idea > >> Possible future kafka integrations > >> Etc. > > > > > > Given the scope outlined here as well as the aspiration to make this a > cross > > cutting set of features that work with clients that aren't part of > ActiveMQ > > land but just JMS clients in general then I'd lean towards a -1 of > creating > > a new subproject or building new modules into Artemis that provide these > > features. > > > > My suggestion would be to go the route of an incubator project where you > > could work out the goals as aspirations of this new project and build a > > community around that. I think there would be more willingness from > folks > > that aren't ActiveMQ centric developers to contribute to a project that > > lives on it's own given the current goal seems to be that it's something > > that works with many different JMS client implementations, most of which > > aren't ActiveMQ.... > > > > Have a look at the incubator process (http://incubator.apache.org/) I > think > > it lends itself to what's being proposed here more so than just spinning > up > > a subproject and starting to write some code. > > > > > > > > > >> The idea then is these "extras" are generic in fact they can be > >> released independently, > >> don't affect the core products > >> are generic meaning they can be re-used. > >> Optional for end users to use. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Mike > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > -- > > Tim Bish > > twitter: @tabish121 > > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
