Just tried with Firefox and it worked. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:15 PM Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 08/31/2017 07:59 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: >> > 1. worked for me... nothing changed really... >> >> I had a space in the path that the extractor was nice enough to add, >> although it seems like it should be smart enough to handle that case as >> spaces are valid if a little dumb > > > > I test it all the time with spaces. I have an internal CI doing it with an > example. > > > >> . >> >> > >> > 2. I think this is a bug with one specific browser (Safari). >> >> I was using FireFox so guess not just one browser. > > > What version of Firefox ? >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> On 08/31/2017 03:38 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: >> >>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.3.0 release. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> We had these new features added as part of 2.3.0: >> >>> >> >>> [ARTEMIS-1270] - Provide a Management Console for Artemis >> >>> [ARTEMIS-1322] - Add a ServerLocator option to ignore topology for >> >>> load-balancing >> >>> [ARTEMIS-1324] - Critical Analysis and deadlock detection on broker >> >>> [ARTEMIS-1342] - Support Netty Native KQueue on MacOS >> >>> [ARTEMIS-1348] - Support LVQ for AMQP >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> The release notes can be found here: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12341247 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Source and binary distributions can be found here: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1145/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/2.3.0/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> The Maven repository is here: >> >>> >> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1145 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> The source tag: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.3.0 >> >>> >> >>> I will update the website after the vote has passed. >> >>> >> >>> * The vote will remain open until Sep-5th 2017 at 3:30 PM EST >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.2.0 >> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >>> >> >>> Here's my (binding) +1 >> >>> >> >>> Regards >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> * = (which is over the usual 72 hours, which I decided to give US >> >>> people some extra time to review this release as there is a holiday >> >>> for this coming weekend) >> >>> >> >> Two things I've noticed so far in checking the release: >> >> >> >> 1. After creating a broker instance from the binary tar.gz and running >> >> that >> >> instance I get the following in the console >> >> >> >> Could not load Logmanager "org.jboss.logmanager.LogManager" >> >> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jboss.logmanager.LogManager >> >> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381) >> >> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424) >> >> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335) >> >> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357) >> >> at java.util.logging.LogManager$1.run(LogManager.java:195) >> >> at java.util.logging.LogManager$1.run(LogManager.java:181) >> >> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) >> >> at java.util.logging.LogManager.<clinit>(LogManager.java:181) >> >> at java.util.logging.Logger.demandLogger(Logger.java:448) >> >> at java.util.logging.Logger.getLogger(Logger.java:502) >> >> at >> >> org.apache.activemq.artemis.boot.Artemis.<clinit>(Artemis.java:40) >> >> >> >> 2. When I visit the Web console at http://localhost:8161/console I get >> >> a >> >> console but not with ActiveMQ branding on it, it has mostly Hawt.io >> >> branding >> >> which I'm guessing is wrong ;) This seems -1 worthy unless I've done >> >> something terribly wrong. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Tim Bish >> >> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Tim Bish >> twitter: @tabish121 >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >> > -- > Clebert Suconic
-- Clebert Suconic
