I actually see how to make the copy into dev... let me play with it a
little bit....

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Clebert Suconic
<[email protected]> wrote:
> what about this:
>
> Currently mvn release and mvn upload will always send the release to nexus,
>
> So what about:
>
> - we provide an script to artemis to download the correct bits of the
> release, the release manager would use that script to perform such
> download.
> - The release manager would place it on the dev repository Robbie is
> mentioning... (that means.. we wouldn't really have an extra step).
>
>
> On thing I'm not sure how to do is... how to upload it to the dev dist
> at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/
>
> and how we would make the final move? just a regular copy?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Robbie Gemmell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 13 September 2017 at 14:35, Clebert Suconic
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:21 AM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This was less about time, though there is some benefit in that regard,
>>>> with how much depending on how particular people actually verify the
>>>> checksums I guess.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually this is kind of moot. nexus does that check for you.  You cannot
>>> upload a release with a checksum broken. It won't let you close.
>>>
>>> Like. Last week I had to restart the release once because MVN upload broke
>>> the checksum somewhere.
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>
>> Whether the files in Nexus are ok isn't sufficient. The archives and
>> checksum files in the dist repo are the mirrorer official release
>> artifacts (and strictly only the source ones at that), and Nexus cant
>> check those. There could be a problem deploying those bits for a
>> variety of reasons, so we check they are ok. Users downloading the
>> release archives also tend to grab the checksums from the dist repo
>> because that is their official source, in order to verify downloads
>> that have come from the third party mirrors which dont store the
>> checksums for obvious reasons.
>>
>> Robbie
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to