Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1638
@franz1981 changing flush is still re-engineering..
if there's any code calling flush within the OrderedExecutor, that's a
classical starvation problem.. it's a bug that needs to be removed.
Instead of changing the semantic of flush, lets just avoid the bug... this
PR should be closed IMO.---
