[0] - without a clear migration path and tooling to assist existing users moving from ActiveMQ 5 to Artemis, we risk abandoning those users - who may then be forced to look at alternatives and abandon ActiveMQ all together. This could be counter productive to the original intent.
> On 4 Dec 2017, at 20:32, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Following on from the discussion, "[DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the > ActiveMQ project roadmap" > > linked here for convenience : > - > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Confusion-surrounding-the-ActiveMQ-project-roadmap-td4732935.html > - > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-Confusion-surrounding-the-ActiveMQ-project-roadmap-td4733148.html > > > I would like to propose a vote on ActiveMQ Artemis mainline becoming ActiveMQ > 6. > > [+1] - agree > [-1] . - disagree and provide some reason > [0] - neutral but go ahead > > This vote will be open until Thursday, Dec 07 by the end of the day. > > Here is my +1 (PMC) vote.
