I have added the following statement to the first paragraph in the wiki
page:
The overall objective for working toward feature parity between
ActiveMQ 5.x and Artemis is for Artemis to eventually become ActiveMQ 6.x.
Bruce
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would it be possible to clarify what, if anything, will happen if Artemis
> achieves the described level of feature parity with ActiveMQ 5.x? In other
> words, what is the goal of Artemis' feature parity with 5.x? I think a
> broader road-map like that would really help the community as they could
> look at the Artemis road-map and see that they can help achieve the goal
> (whatever that is) by helping to implement feature X or Y.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Bruce Snyder <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I have created a page on the wiki for the Artemis Roadmap here:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/
> > ActiveMQ+Artemis+Roadmap
> >
> > The goal of this page is stated at the top: to identify the outstanding
> > issues that must be addressed by Artemis in order to achieve some level
> of
> > feature parity with ActiveMQ 5.x.
> >
> > I encourage everyone to contribute to this page and to discuss this
> roadmap
> > on this list.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
