Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1722#discussion_r157736374
--- Diff:
artemis-core-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/core/impl/ResponseCache.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.impl;
+
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
+
+import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.ActiveMQInterruptedException;
+import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.Packet;
+import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.ResponseHandler;
+
+public class ResponseCache {
+
+ private final AtomicInteger writerPointer = new AtomicInteger(0);
+ private final AtomicInteger sequence = new AtomicInteger(0);
+
+ private final Packet[] store;
+ private ResponseHandler responseHandler;
+
+ public ResponseCache(int size) {
+ this.store = new Packet[size];
+ }
+
+ public long add(Packet packet) {
+ int pointer = writerPointer.getAndUpdate(operand -> {
--- End diff --
endedup just making a simpler solution using the already existing and
tested ConcurrentLongHashMap we have, made all this a lot simpler.
---
