I think using the notification support is fine but just wondering from the standpoint of backwards compatibility if someone has software already listening for OpenWire advisories. However I do agree it would be a pain to have to support 2 types.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Andy Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > definitely expand on the notifications already there, It wouldnt make sens > to have 2 different implementations. What we also would need to do is > replace the current advisory support that is built into the Openwire > protocol with this. > > On 10 January 2018 at 13:19, Christopher Shannon < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > One thing that is missing is 5.x style advisory support so I wanted to > > discuss how we can add that. The two ideas I had were to either expand > on > > the notification service support that already exists (ie add more > > notification types) or to implement it using the plugin API. > > > > The easiest thing would be to just add new notification types to match > > existing advisory messages that were in 5.x. This uses the Core protocol > > and would be different addresses. I'm not sure if it also makes sense to > > try and have a plugin that will also publish OpenWire style advisory > > messages to the legacy 5.x topics as well. > > > > What do you guys think? > > >
