It would be nice to have a direction from Apache Foundation on Containers. I will reach to infra tomorrow or the day after (since I planned to do an Artemis release tomorrow)
@Victor: It would be nice to make your work official here... would appreciate any help if we can move this forward. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been maintaining a docker image for quite a while: > https://hub.docker.com/r/vromero/activemq-artemis/ (> 100k pulls) > It does work, its fairly configurable, supports Ubuntu and Alpine (big deal > for the docker community) and I'm happy to make changes if anyone feels > there is area for improvement. > > This said, we kinda already had this discussion, see thread I started back > in 11/7/16: *Contributing to the Apache Docker Account*. > But things were rather confusing regarding that Apache docker account back > then. > > I was mostly talking to John D. Ament, that seemed pretty knowledgeable > about the account and about what was expected. > John if you are reading, perhaps you could let us know how things are right > now in that regard? > > > > 2018-03-01 11:20 GMT-08:00 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>: > >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Arthur Naseef <a...@amlinv.com> wrote: >> > I know how to create a docker image, and do so with a maven build. >> > >> > And getting an image into a registry isn't too hard. That's the "docker >> > push" command. I suspect the docker-maven-plugin may be able to do that >> as >> > part of a build. >> > >> > The part I don't know is how it can be published to a central docker >> > registry. May be as simple as setting up an account on the central >> server. >> >> >> Yes.. that's the thing I'm wondering. I was wondering if there was an >> apache account we could use. or if we would need to create an account >> for activemq. >> >> > >> > As for making it part of the release - I think it would be great to have >> a >> > public docker image updated on every release. However, I wouldn't want >> to >> > make it part of the main Artemis build (i.e. "mvn clean install" from the >> > activemq-artemis.git root) since the main deliverable from Apache >> projects >> > is the source, and requiring everyone who builds Artemis to have docker >> and >> > build the image seems like overkill. >> >> >> That's what I expected. I was just wondering if there was an apache >> precedent on that. Docker becomes a binary distribution on that sense. >> -- Clebert Suconic
