Since I fixed it.. I will try to cut the release today.. will send it
out as soon as it's ready any time now.

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:48 PM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it’s importsnt to fix this bug.  I broke it and I want to fix it :)
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:12 PM Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 03/08/2018 05:59 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>> > I'm pushing this back to monday...I thought that was an easy fix and i
>> > will need some more tweaking.
>> >
>> >
>> > Meanwhile.. @everyone: avoiding pushing anything that will break the
>> > release now :) doc fixes and test fixes is of course fine. I'm running
>> > the whole testsuite before each PR I send now.. which is 2 hours..
>> > anything other than that will push the release further.
>>
>> Why not just cut a branch now then and cherry-pick things that should go
>> into 2.5.0 to make it simpler to mange ?  That way work can progress on
>> things that might be better in 2.6.0 concurrently
>>
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Clebert Suconic
>> > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I'm already on it... i'm working on it.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:35 AM, Michael André Pearce
>> >> <michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
>> >>> Can we add
>> >>>
>> >>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1940
>> >>>
>> >>> As a blocker.
>> >>>
>> >>> On reviewing the PR and seeing why this PR is needed/wanted, it seems
>> >>> whilst console is most visibly affected by a change done , it has more
>> >>> serious effect that the network pinger also seems to get shutdown and not
>> >>> kept alive on slave failback. Concern also is if there is anything else.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 8 Mar 2018, at 12:28, Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1736 is a
>> >>>> blocker as
>> >>>> well, Ive just sent a PR with a fix
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 7 March 2018 at 04:59, Michael André Pearce
>> >>>> <michael.andre.pea...@me.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> @Clebert
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Someone in the user threads has raised what looks like a blocker if
>> >>>>> it’s
>> >>>>> real.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Something to do with large messages and broker crashing with
>> >>>>> 2.5.0-SNAPSHOTz
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Have you seen it?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 2 Mar 2018, at 23:42, Clebert Suconic
>> >>>>>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> If you have anything in mind that you consider a blocking.....
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> That’s the idea of the heads up.  My expectation was the examples.
>> >>>>>> But
>> >>>>> if
>> >>>>>> you want to request another change, like be PR pending you have
>> >>>>>> that I
>> >>>>> need
>> >>>>>> to work on ? :)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Let me know if you have anything in mind that is a blocker.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:46 AM MichaelAndrePearce <
>> >>>>>> michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> yes a list of blocking tasks, so that we can all focus on those if
>> >>>>> needed.
>> >>>>>>> It
>> >>>>>>> sounded like there were a few examples, but it seems like you have
>> >>>>>>> that
>> >>>>> in
>> >>>>>>> hand already.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Sent from:
>> >>>>>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Clebert Suconic
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Tim Bish
>> twitter: @tabish121
>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to