+1 On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/16/2018 10:49 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > >> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.0 release. >> >> The release notes can be found here: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?versi >> on=12342903&&projectId=12315920 >> >> There is a new commits report I made that I'm introducing on this release: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-art >> emis/2.6.0/artemis-2.6.0.html >> >> Source and binary distributions can be found here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.6.0 >> >> The Maven repository is here: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1157 >> >> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples: >> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide >> /validating-releases.html >> >> The source tag: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.g >> it;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.6.0 >> >> I will update the website after the vote has passed. >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0 >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> Here's my +1 >> . >> >> > +1 > > * Validate the signatures and checksums > * Review license and notice files in the archives > * Build from source and ran some of the tests > * Ran binary broker and ran some samples and performance tests against it > * Used mvn apache-rat:check to validate license headers in place > > > -- > Tim Bish > twitter: @tabish121 > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >
