+1 On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Francesco Nigro <nigro....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > *built and run some tests > > Il giorno mer 6 giu 2018 alle ore 16:45 Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> > ha scritto: > > > On 06/04/2018 08:35 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.1 release. This > > > is the 3rd Respin and I have fixed the previous issues encountered. > > > > > > > > > This is a micro release, with bug fixes only, where I would like to > > > highlight these fixes: > > > > > > [ARTEMIS-1568] Expired Messages were not transversing clustering > > redistribution. > > > (this could affect other queues beyond the Expiry as well) > > > > > > [ARTEMIS-1872]Check for queue exists before creating shared queue > > > > > > [ARTEMIS-1902] Message redistribution is not stopped when consumers > > > count on remote node reaches 0 (AMQP) > > > > > > > > > > > > The full JIRA report is here: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12315920&version=12343356 > > > > > > > > > The git commit report is here: > > > http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/commit-report-2.6.1.html > > > > > > (notice this report is not indexed on the website yet, I will add a > > > link and update the report if needed once the release is approved) > > > > > > > > > > > > Source and binary distributions can be found here: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.6.1 > > > > > > > > > The Maven repository is here: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheactivemq-1164 > > > > > > > > > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples: > > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking- > guide/validating-releases.html > > > > > > The source tag: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis. > git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.6.1 > > > > > > > > > I will update the website after the vote has passed. > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.6.1 > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > Here's my +1 > > > > > > > +1 > > > > * Validated signatures and checksums > > * Checked for license and notice files in the archives > > * built from source and ran some of the integration tests > > * used mvn apache-rat:check to scan for missing license headers > > * Ran some external examples against a running broker from the binary > > distribution. > > > > -- > > Tim Bish > > twitter: @tabish121 > > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > > > >
