On 19 June 2018 at 05:10, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.2 release.
>
>
> This is a small release, with bug fixes which were cherry-picked from
> master into 2.6.x branch.
>
> For more details, please refer the release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12343404
>
> And the git commit report:
> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/commit-report-2.6.2.html
>
>
> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.6.2
>
>
> The Maven repository is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1166
>
> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
>
>
> The source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.6.2
>
>
> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here's my +1


+1 (non-binding)

I gave things a check over as follows:
- Verified the various signatures and checksums.
- Ran mvn apache-rat:check to verify licence headers in the source tar.gz
- Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files being present in archives.
- Ran the build and 'fast-tests' profile from the tar.gz.
- Ran the systests from the amqp package in integration-tests.
- Started broker from the tar.gz binary, ran some AMQP examples against it.
- Tested some cases to verify related bug fix made was in effect.

Robbie

Reply via email to