Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2478#discussion_r243843391
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/paging/impl/PagingManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -335,19 +335,25 @@ public void deletePageStore(final SimpleString
storeName) throws Exception {
}
/**
- * stores is a ConcurrentHashMap, so we don't need to synchronize this
method
+ * This method creates a new store if not exist.
*/
@Override
public PagingStore getPageStore(final SimpleString storeName) throws
Exception {
if (managementAddress != null &&
storeName.startsWith(managementAddress)) {
return null;
}
- PagingStore store = stores.get(storeName);
- if (store != null) {
- return store;
+ try {
--- End diff --
I think that `stores.get` is better that will be used in the fast path as
it was before: `chm:.get` is completly lock-free, while `chm::computeIfAbsent`
will lock on segment level ie better to fallback to `chm::computeIfAbsent` only
if `chm::get` return `null`
---
