I agree with Jeff here.
Its very similar story with NMS as i noted, its stable api and the open wire implementation is well used. There has been activity even in the amqp impl last year as noted, yes it didnt release but it shows activity and want. Like wise there are other projects active and implementing their own impl based on the nms api as i noted. I agree we can clean up a little with the projects never released and literally no activity at all in past few yars, but i think its key to keep api (released), openwire (released) and amqp (activity in dev/user lists) ones in the nms space. Get Outlook for Android On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:27 PM +0000, "jgenender" <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: Thanks for the explanation. I think I mentioned Jamie Goodyear had showed interest to help with JIRAs and know there are others who will help when important JIRAs pop up. I think those APIs are simple clients that probably don’t require a lot of loving care and are relatively stable. I don’t think stackoverflow is necessarily a good indicator of its use. They are pretty simple to utilize. A better indicator of user base is number of downloads. But I don’t know if we track that. Also remember these are not major components of AMQ. They are just connectors so I don’t expect heavy activity. Also, if there truly are openwire alternatives, then I get your point. But STOMP and AMQP are not openwire. I would agree that there is not likely to be much additional enhancements to them as they do what they do. But I do see serious bugs getting fixed by some of the committers. I think the release of them needs to be fixed and this came up earlier on CMS, but there was no resolution. I do know Jamie wanted and offered to fix it. -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
