Most of the time I'd just decide to do another release Real Soon if an important bug came up at this stage...since its the same amount of work, folks wont get the new fix any quicker, but respinning means other folks dont get the things they could use now, and other stuff might come up in the next few days suggesting more delays or releases again.
This would be a good case for the exception though, given its about invalid message delivery and if I'm reading the below correctly has only being present since 2.7.0 under 6 weeks ago. Avoiding announcing another new minor release with the issue is perhaps wise. On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 06:01, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a question. I have found a critical issue: > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2656/commits/46d550bda25eae609ee874f5f88b28221a141083 > > It's not a regression on 2.8.0, but a blocker bug on 2.7.0. > > Would I be better on cancel 2.8.0 and respin it.. or do a 2.8.1 asap? > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:11 AM michael.andre.pearce > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 have built locally, and run a number of basic flow tests using core and > > amqp.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. > > -------- Original message --------From: Francesco Nigro > > <[email protected]> Date: 27/04/2019 15:50 (GMT+00:00) To: > > [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.8.0 > > +1Il sab 27 apr 2019, 16:09 Christopher Shannon > > <[email protected]> ha scritto:> +1>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at > > 12:18 PM Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote:>> > On 4/25/19 9:48 PM, > > Clebert Suconic wrote:> > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ > > Artemis 2.8.0 release.> > >> > > This is basically a bug fix release, with > > the addition of the following> > feature:> > >> > > [ARTEMIS-2306] - > > Support ActiveMQ5 feature JMSXGroupFirstForConsumer> > >> > > The commit > > report with a full change list is here:> > >> >> > > http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.8.0.html> > > > >> > >> > > And a release notes from jira:> > >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12345169> > > > >> > > Source and binary distributions can be found here:> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.8.0> > > > >> > > The Maven repository is here:> > >> >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1186> > > > >> > > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo:> > >> >> > > http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html> > > > >> > >> > > The source tag:> > >> >> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.8.0> > > > >> > >> > > I will update the website after the vote has passed.> > >> > > > >> > >> > > [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.8.0> > > [ ] +0 > > no opinion> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)> > >> > >> > > Here's my > > +1> > >> > +1> >> >> > * Validated signatures and checksums> > * Checked > > for license and notice files> > * Validated source licenses with 'mvn > > apache-rat:check -Prelease'> > * Ran binary broker and tested using Qpid > > JMS example (secured and> > anonymous)> > * Built from source and ran some > > of the tests and all AMQP integration> > tests> >> > --> > Tim Bish> >> >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic
