Thanks to Tim for clearing these old files out.
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 17:29, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you able to get to this Jean-Baptiste? > > If not, perhaps another PMC member can run the commands instead > (examples below)? > > Thanks, > Robbie > > On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 18:12, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Great, thanks Jean-Baptiste. > > > > Robbie > > > > On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 18:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > I will thanks. > > > > > > Le 23 mai 2019 à 19:05, à 19:05, Robbie Gemmell > > > <[email protected]> a écrit: > > > >I have now updated the links on the 5.14.5 release page to point to > > > >the archive. Can a PMC member clean it from the dist area please? > > > > > > > >That could be accomplished by running e.g: > > > >svn rm -m "clean out old release from mirrors" > > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.14.5/ > > > > > > > > > > > >Similarly, I think the apollo subdir of the dist area could be > > > >removed. There are no releases in it anymore, it holds only a KEYS > > > >file which isnt mirrored, isnt linked to from the site anymore, is > > > >archived alongside the releases, and has contents duplicated in the > > > >main KEYS file already. > > > > > > > >That could be accomplished by running e.g: > > > >svn rm -m "remove apollo release subdir" > > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/activemq-apollo/ > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > >Robbie > > > > > > > >On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 16:09, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for cleaning up the Apollo and Artemis bits Clebert (Artemis > > > >> 2.7.0 can now go too, and 2.8.0 once 2.8.1 is on the site and > > > >> announced). > > > >> > > > >> For ActiveMQ 5.14.5, I wouldnt consider it an active branch given its > > > >> age, the non trivial number of 5.15.x releases done since then > > > >without > > > >> any new 5.14.x, and multiple security fixes in 5.15.x that were not > > > >> backported. Noone has replied to suggest otherwise, so unless someone > > > >> does I will proceed to update the 5.14.5 release page on the website > > > >> tomorrow to point to the archive area, then ask again that a PMC > > > >> member clears it from the dist area. > > > >> > > > >> Robbie > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 20:27, Clebert Suconic > > > ><[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > I have cross referenced with the other post about docs... I thought > > > >I > > > >> > was answering that post. > > > >> > > > > >> > However, since I accidentally promised it :) I am doing the cleanup > > > >> > > > > >> > Artemis: > > > >> > Deleting 1.5.6 > > > >> > Deleting 2.6.1 > > > >> > Deleting 2.6.2 > > > >> > Deleting 2.6.3 > > > >> > Deleting 2.6.4 > > > >> > (2.7.0 will go after I send the announcement.. working on it.. I > > > >had a > > > >> > few issues on updating the website) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Apollo: > > > >> > Removed > > > >> > > > > >> > NMS: > > > >> > Is it ok to remove 1.5.0? (I'm not sure if these two are active > > > >branches) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > for ActiveMQ: > > > >> > > > > >> > should I remove 5.14.5? I'm not sure if 5.14 is an active branch or > > > >not. > > > >> > > > > >> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 1:55 PM Robbie Gemmell > > > ><[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Great, thanks Clebert. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Robbie > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 01:10, Clebert Suconic > > > ><[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Ok. Thanks a lot to contribute to the discussion. That’s > > > >sensible. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I will remove some older versions. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:43 AM Robbie Gemmell > > > ><[email protected]> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I noticed there are various older releases in the dist area > > > >being > > > >> > > > > mirrored that either definitely or probably should not be any > > > >longer. > > > >> > > > > Could PMC members clean them up as appropriate please? > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Apollo 1.7.1 is still being mirrored, it seems like it should > > > >not be > > > >> > > > > since its deprecated and isnt listed on the new site at all > > > >that I > > > >> > > > > see. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > For Artemis, 1.5.6, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.3, and 2.6.4 are still > > > >being > > > >> > > > > mirrored and shouldn't be, they aren't mentioned on the main > > > >download > > > >> > > > > page for Artemis (2.7.0 is, presumably to become 2.8.0 later > > > >today), > > > >> > > > > and the past releases page links to the archive as would be > > > >expected > > > >> > > > > and not the mirrors. (2.7.0 should also be removed from > > > >mirroring > > > >> > > > > later after the download pages are updated for 2.8.0, which > > > >is now > > > >> > > > > mostly mirrored.) > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > For the 5.x releases, 5.14.5 is still being mirrored but > > > >perhaps > > > >> > > > > should not be. The main download page for 5.x only mentions > > > >the latest > > > >> > > > > 5.15.9 release. The release page for 5.14.5 does still link > > > >to the > > > >> > > > > mirrors but you have to drill down to find that page, its > > > >over 2 years > > > >> > > > > old now and there doesn't seem to be intent to do further > > > >5.14.x, so > > > >> > > > > its perhaps time to stop mirroring this release? > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Robbie > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > Clebert Suconic > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Clebert Suconic
