Victor, I'm using your image right now. I even submitted PR with version
update to 2.10.0.



On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 17:55 Victor <[email protected]> wrote:

> I know its not official but my image does the trick for many in the
> meantime the infra nuances are figured out:
> https://hub.docker.com/r/vromero/activemq-artemis
>
>
> El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 1:33, Clebert Suconic (<
> [email protected]>) escribió:
>
> > at the time I tried, I would have had to moved a few people within
> > Infra, release in a certain way, and a few other issues that I ended
> > up giving up.. (it wasn't easy).
> >
> > Perhaps someone would have enough stamina to change things at apache
> > to make it a better experience, or understand the limitations in a way
> > we can actually do it.
> >
> > I have a few scripts within Artemis repository, and we can definitely
> > improve from there.
> >
> > Having said that, if you want to collaborate on making it happen, I'm
> > all for it!
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:29 PM Krzysztof <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > >
> > > I am wondering if there is any reason why there is no official docker
> > image
> > > of Apache Artemis available on docker hub?
> > >
> > >
> > > In NMS-AMQP project we are trying to enable interop tests in CI
> pipeline
> > > using Artemis running in a docker container.
> > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/34
> > >
> > >
> > > As there is no official image available I decided to create PoC using
> > some
> > > external image. It works just fine, but as Michael Pearce suggested we
> > > should be using the official distribution of Artemis. I could build the
> > > image on the fly, but it doesn't seem the right way to go in my humble
> > > opinion.
> > >
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to add the official image of Artemis to docker
> hub?
> > I
> > > know that there are quite a few images of other products built by
> Apache
> > > Foundation out there.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm willing to help, but I will need a little guidance.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Krzysztof Porebski
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
>

Reply via email to