Thanks for the clarification, Robbie. The link you provided was helpful.
Cheers!


Justin

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:13 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
>  +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
> have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it
> is the PMC that must agree to the release happening.
>
> I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm
> not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC
> obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos
> votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd
> expect its the former though.
>
> This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details
> the 3 binding +1 votes requirement:
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
> I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from
> Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise),
> which if cast would get the required 3.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
> > you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
> >
> >   For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
> > positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
> > Votes cast by PMC members are binding.
> >
> > So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've
> > received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC
> votes
> > are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this
> > incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback.
> >
> > It also says:
> >
> >   Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download
> all
> > signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they
> meet
> > all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate
> all
> > cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on
> their
> > own platform.
> >
> > I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted.
> >
> > Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi PMC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Get Outlook for Android
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4v...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux
> box
> > > and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (Binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are
> now
> > > > resolved.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release,
> please
> > > > > check it and vote accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP
> > > client..
> > > > >
> > > > > Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to
> > > > > make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly,
> > > > > creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to
> nuget.
> > > > >
> > > > > The files can be grabbed
> > > > > from:
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/
> > > > >
> > > > > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to