What Infra offered didn’t make it easy to make a service like project to be officially built on docker. I would appreciate a separate discussion if you find a way.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Clebert, > > The purpose is more to populate docker hub within the build. > > It's what I'm doing for Karaf: > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags > > Regards > JB > > On 02/12/2019 20:51, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > The "official" image is something you will have to work with Apache > > Infra. their support is limited as in Apache the release is the > > Source. > > > > I hope things have changed on apache regarding docker. In any case it > > would really benefit to have a separate thread discussion showing the > > progress on that front, as in if the infra team have improved their > > support on docker or not. > > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: > >> - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image > >> for ActiveMQ > >> - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios) > >> > >> I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase. > >> > >> Thoughts ? > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> jbono...@apache.org > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- Clebert Suconic