What Infra offered didn’t make it easy to make a service like project to be
officially built on docker.
I would appreciate a separate discussion if you find a way.

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi Clebert,
>
> The purpose is more to populate docker hub within the build.
>
> It's what I'm doing for Karaf:
>
> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/12/2019 20:51, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > The "official" image is something you will have to work with Apache
> > Infra. their support is limited as in Apache the release is the
> > Source.
> >
> > I hope things have changed on apache regarding docker. In any case it
> > would really benefit to have a separate thread discussion showing the
> > progress on that front, as in if the infra team have improved their
> > support on docker or not.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on:
> >> - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image
> >> for ActiveMQ
> >> - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios)
> >>
> >> I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase.
> >>
> >> Thoughts ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbono...@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to