Hi All, I'm happy to see that the report triggered a discussion regarding the JMS 2.0 impl.
Thank you to everyone for the hard work on this major new feature and the JDK 9+ support! Bruce On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Yes, so JDK 9+ on 5.16.0 and JMS 2.0 after 5.16.0. Fair enough, I'm > moving forward like this. > > Thanks for your feedback guys. > > Regards > JB > > On 06/01/2020 13:36, Christopher Shannon wrote: > > I agree with Robbie, it's a -1 from me to try and include JMS 2.0 at this > > point in 5.16.0 as it's way too late to try and add such a big change. > It > > needs to be 5.17.0 or higher. > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Even if it were almost complete, which it doesnt sound like it is, > >> such a significant change would still seem better positioned for a > >> 5.17.0 at this point than dropped into an almost-ready 5.16.0 at the > >> last moment. > >> > >> Either way I would suggest updating the draft report to be clearer as > >> it doesnt currently read in line with the below, saying "5.16.0 will > >> be an important milestone with full JDK 9+ support and JMS 2.0 support > >> as well." > >> > >> The example skeleton on reporter.apache.org doesnt include the stats > >> from what I recall as they often asked folks not to include them, so > >> I'd drop those. I just give a summary line in reports. > >> > >> Robbie > >> > >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 12:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Robbie, > >>> > >>> yeah, 5.16.0 is still my top priority and it's almost ready. JDK 9+ is > >>> OK (including on Karaf). JMS 2.0 is "optional" for 5.16.0 (but I think > >>> it's worth to try to have it). So, it's more an indication in terms of > >>> "best effort", not a strong commitment. > >>> In term of timeline, 5.16.0 could be submitted to vote end of next > week. > >>> > >>> For the report, we should use the reporter.apache.org that create the > >>> report skeleton for us. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> On 06/01/2020 11:53, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > >>>> You mentioned on the 5.15.11 vote thread that a 5.16.0 vote would > >>>> happen in late November, but it was suggested to skip that particular > >>>> week and so folks had returned from holidays around US Thanksgiving. > >>>> Its been a bit longer now, but is the intent still to release 5.16.0 > >>>> very soon? I ask as the text added in the report draft indicates > >>>> 5.16.0 will include JMS 2 support, but there doesnt seem to have been > >>>> work committed on that as yet. If thats the case it would seem > >>>> surprising to include in 5.16.0 at this point, several weeks after > >>>> indication it was primed for release, instead of say doing 5.16.0 and > >>>> only then adding potentially large changes afterwards towards a 5.17.0 > >>>> following the needed time to bake them. > >>>> > >>>> The mailing list stats should probably be removed from the report, and > >>>> just a summary line given. The board have in the past typically asked > >>>> for the stats not to be c&p from the reporter tool unless they show > >>>> important details. It seems like all they show is that it was a > >>>> holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the > >>>> prior one without thier effect. > >>>> > >>>> I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th release > >> date. > >>>> > >>>> Robbie > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 07:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Bruce, > >>>>> > >>>>> Happy new year to you as well ! > >>>>> > >>>>> I added some content about ActiveMQ (releases, stats, overall > >> activity). > >>>>> Please let me know if it's OK for you. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> JB > >>>>> > >>>>> On 06/01/2020 06:28, Bruce Snyder wrote: > >>>>>> Happy New Year everyone! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your contributions > >> to the > >>>>>> latest report to the ASF board: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Bruce > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>>> jbono...@apache.org > >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> jbono...@apache.org > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
